Incidence of Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injuries and Associated Factors After Pediatric Congenital Heart Surgery A Prospective Cohort Study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citação
JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, v.49, n.2, p.137-142, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the incidence, characteristics, and factors associated with medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSI). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: The sample comprised 136 children in the postoperative period after congenital heart surgery. The study setting was in a 31-bed pediatric surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Patients were followed from admission, with daily skin assessments, until the onset of MARSI or ICU discharge. Outcomes were compared by Fisher's exact test, Pearson's chi(2) test, Mann-Whitney test, Brunner-Munzel test, and Welch 2-sample t test. RESULTS: The incidence of MARSI was 60.3%, with 85 injuries in 82 patients. The highest occurrence was on postoperative day 2 (27 wounds; 31.8%). The most frequent medical adhesive associated with MARSI was transparent film dressing (n = 74; 86.6%). Factors associated with MARSI were age (P = .000), number of devices inserted (P = .000), Braden Q Scale score (P = .005), duration of surgery (P = .021), cardiopulmonary bypass duration (P = .000), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .000), and length of ICU stay (P = .000). Children who developed MARSI received more blood components (P = .039), vasopressors (P = .000), and corticosteroids (P = 0.000); required longer sedation (P = .000); and had more edema (P = .001). CONCLUSION: This high incidence indicates the need for greater awareness and prompt action in response to MARSI. Polyurethane transparent film without concurrent use of a skin barrier product should be avoided.
Palavras-chave
Adhesives, Critical care nursing, Dressings, Intensive care units, Pediatric, Risk factors, Skin care, Skin injuries, Skin tears
Referências
  1. Campos LR., 2015, RESID PEDIAT, V5, P14
  2. Curley MAQ, 2003, NURS RES, V52, P22, DOI 10.1097/00006199-200301000-00004
  3. Fernandes Juliana Dumêt, 2011, An. Bras. Dermatol., V86, P102, DOI 10.1590/S0365-05962011000100014
  4. Fumarola Sian, 2020, J Wound Care, V29, pS1, DOI 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup3c.S1
  5. Garraud O, 2017, J THORAC DIS, V9, pE146, DOI 10.21037/jtd.2017.02.03
  6. Grove GL, 2014, J WOUND OSTOMY CONT, V41, P40, DOI 10.1097/01.WON.0000436669.79024.b0
  7. Hirleman E, 2008, PERFUSION-UK, V23, P311, DOI 10.1177/0267659109105079
  8. Kim MJ, 2019, J WOUND OSTOMY CONT, V46, P491, DOI 10.1097/WON.0000000000000592
  9. Lamblin V, 2006, CRIT CARE, V10, DOI 10.1186/cc5128
  10. Longui CA, 2007, J PEDIAT-BRAZIL, V83, pS163, DOI 10.2223/JPED.1713
  11. Lund C H, 2001, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, V30, P41, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01520.x
  12. Maia Ana Claudia A. R, 2011, Rev. paul. pediatr., V29, P405
  13. Martorell R, 2006, ACTA PAEDIATR, V95, P86, DOI 10.1080/08035320500495563
  14. McLane Kathleen M, 2004, J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, V31, P168
  15. McNichol L, 2013, J WOUND OSTOMY CONT, V40, P365, DOI 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182995516
  16. Meszes A, 2017, WORLD J PEDIATR, V13, P165, DOI 10.1007/s12519-016-0070-6
  17. Noonan Catherine, 2006, J Pediatr Nurs, V21, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.pedn.2006.07.002
  18. Prudent M, 2015, TRANSFUS APHER SCI, V52, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.transci.2015.04.006
  19. Schindler CA, 2007, AM J CRIT CARE, V16, P568
  20. Seghaye MC, 1996, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V112, P687, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70053-3
  21. Stiller B, 2001, INTENS CARE MED, V27, P193, DOI 10.1007/s001340000704
  22. Wang D, 2019, ADV SKIN WOUND CARE, V32, P176, DOI 10.1097/01.ASW.0000553601.05196.fb
  23. Wysocki AB., 2012, ACUTE CHRONIC WOUNDS, V4th ed., P40