Executive Functions Beyond the ""Holy Trinity"": A Scoping Review

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2024
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Dimensions
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
Autores
DIAS, Natalia Martins
HELSDINGEN, Isabela Espezin
LINS, Eduarda Kammers Rita Momm de
ETCHEVERRIA, Camila Erlinda
STEFFEN, Luana
CARDOSO, Caroline de Oliveira
LOPES, Fernanda Machado
Citação
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, v.38, n.2, p.107-125, 2024
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: Executive functions (EFs) are a multifaceted construct, important for several outcomes throughout life. The most commonly addressed executive components are inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. To map how other executive components are addressed conceptually and methodologically in the literature, a scoping review was carried out. Method: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline was used. The database search (2017-2022) was carried out on the APA PsycInfo, Medline, Scopus, LILACS, and SciELO databases. A total of 3,473 articles were identified; 1,302 remained after screening. Given the large number of articles, a sample calculation was performed (95% CI and 5% error), with 297 articles randomly selected for full-text reading and 242 studies included for analysis. Results: There was a predominance of health application studies in adults and older adults and in developed countries. There is relative conceptual consensus that EF are a multidimensional construct; however, there is no explicit identification of the theoretical model used in the studies. A diversity of EF was evidenced, which broadens the understanding of the construct, its assessment, and intervention targets. Furthermore, there was a variety of instruments used to assess these skills, with a predominance of performance tests, often with construct-instrument ambivalence between studies. Conclusions: The mapping showed a diversity of skills referred to as EF in addition to the core components and identified the instruments used in their assessment. Greater conceptual and structural clarity and greater methodological care are fundamental to support the assessment of EF and their intervention.
Palavras-chave
neuropsychology, construct validity, theoretical models, executive functioning
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/59238
Referências
  1. Ahmed SF, 2019, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V111, P446, DOI 10.1037/edu0000296
  2. Baggetta P, 2016, MIND BRAIN EDUC, V10, P10, DOI 10.1111/mbe.12100
  3. Barkley R.A., 2012, EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS
  4. Bechara A, 2019, PSYCHOL SCI PUBL INT, V20, P96, DOI 10.1177/1529100619860513
  5. Bechi M, 2018, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V32, P746, DOI 10.1037/neu0000456
  6. Bernhardt M, 2021, J NERV MENT DIS, V209, P336, DOI 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001301
  7. Bosenbark DD, 2018, CHILD NEUROPSYCHOL, V24, P106, DOI 10.1080/09297049.2016.1225708
  8. Camargo B.V., 2013, TEMAS PSICOL, V21, P513, DOI [10.9788/TP2013.2-16, DOI 10.9788/TP2013.2-16, https://doi.org/10.9788/tp2013.2-16]
  9. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University, 2011, 11 CTR DEV CHILD HAR
  10. Chan RCK, 2008, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V23, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010
  11. Pascual AC, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01582
  12. Dawson DR, 2017, NEUROPSYCHOL REHABIL, V27, P599, DOI 10.1080/09602011.2017.1313379
  13. de Santana A. N., 2019, REV AVALIACAO PSICOL, V18, P96, DOI [10.15689/ap.2019, DOI 10.15689/AP.2019.1801.14668.11]
  14. de Souza W. M., 2021, ESTUDOS PESQUISAS PS, V21, P277, DOI [10.12957/epp .2021.59386, DOI 10.12957/EPP.2021.59386]
  15. DePryck K., 2022, P SOC INF TECHN TEAC, P592
  16. Doebel S, 2020, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P942, DOI 10.1177/1745691620904771
  17. Duncan J, 1996, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V30, P257, DOI 10.1006/cogp.1996.0008
  18. Follmer DJ, 2018, EDUC PSYCHOL-US, V53, P42, DOI 10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295
  19. Friedman NP, 2022, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V47, P72, DOI 10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0
  20. Friedman NP, 2017, CORTEX, V86, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023
  21. Goldstein S, 2013, HANDBOOK OF RESILIENCE IN CHILDREN, SECOND EDITION, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3661-4_1
  22. Hackman DA, 2015, DEVELOPMENTAL SCI, V18, P686, DOI 10.1111/desc.12246
  23. Henrich J, 2010, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V33, P111, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X10000725
  24. Henrich J, 2010, NATURE, V466, P29, DOI 10.1038/466029a
  25. Isquith PK, 2013, APPL NEUROPSYCH-CHIL, V2, P125, DOI 10.1080/21622965.2013.748389
  26. Júlio F, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00585
  27. Karr JE, 2018, PSYCHOL BULL, V144, P1147, DOI 10.1037/bul0000160
  28. Lace John W, 2022, Appl Neuropsychol Child, V11, P579, DOI 10.1080/21622965.2021.1910950
  29. Law N, 2018, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V80, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.12.035
  30. Lezak MD., 2012, Neuropsychological Assessment, VFifth edition ed
  31. Lovstad M, 2012, BRAIN INJURY, V26, P1586, DOI 10.3109/02699052.2012.698787
  32. Mace RA, 2019, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V33, P1007, DOI 10.1037/neu0000563
  33. Manarte L, 2021, PSYCHIAT RES, V304, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114129
  34. Moreno-Manso JM, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17103596
  35. Martens KAE, 2018, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V32, P950, DOI 10.1037/neu0000478
  36. Massignan C., 2021, BRAZILIAN J HLTH REV, V4, P23002, DOI [10.34119/bjhrv4n5, DOI 10.34119/BJHRV4N5]
  37. Miller KJ, 2005, PEDIATR ANN, V34, P310, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
  38. Miyake A., 2000, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V41, P49, DOI 10.1006/COGP.1999.0734
  39. Miyake A, 2012, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V21, P8, DOI 10.1177/0963721411429458
  40. Nigg JT, 2017, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V58, P361, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12675
  41. Nyongesa MK, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00311
  42. Ouzzani M, 2016, SYST REV-LONDON, V5, DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
  43. Patrick KE, 2020, CHILD NEUROPSYCHOL, V26, P649, DOI 10.1080/09297049.2020.1713311
  44. Pauwels L, 2018, AGING-US, V10, P1789, DOI 10.18632/aging.101514
  45. Peters MDJ, 2015, INT J EVID-BASED HEA, V13, P141, DOI 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
  46. Pfeifer JH, 2021, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V89, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.09.002
  47. Pluck G., 2020, Psychology Neuroscience, V13, P158, DOI 10.1037/PNE0000195
  48. Poon K, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02311
  49. Rabin LA, 2005, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V20, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.acn.2004.02.005
  50. Ramos-Galarza C, 2020, J APPL RES HIGH EDUC, V12, P444, DOI 10.1108/JARHE-10-2018-0221
  51. Randers L, 2020, PSYCHIAT RES, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113498
  52. Ratinaud P., 2012, Journees internationales d'Analyse statistique des Donnees Textuelles, P835
  53. Rodriguez V. A., 2021, POIESIS, V40, P39, DOI [10.21501/16920945.4051, DOI 10.21501/16920945.4051]
  54. Romero-López M, 2018, AN PSICOL-SPAIN, V34, P490, DOI 10.6018/analesps.34.3.307391
  55. Roy A, 2021, ORPHANET J RARE DIS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s13023-021-02051-5
  56. Sakamoto S, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0201871
  57. Sánchez-Sansegundo M, 2020, DIAGNOSTICS, V10, DOI 10.3390/diagnostics10121091
  58. Sanz JH, 2018, J PEDIATR-US, V202, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.018
  59. Schirmbeck K, 2020, INFANT CHILD DEV, V29, DOI 10.1002/icd.2164
  60. Seabra A. G., 2020, RELATORIO NACL ALFAB
  61. Sin E, 2021, AGING MENT HEALTH, V25, P1224, DOI 10.1080/13607863.2020.1749832
  62. Singh SM, 2020, PSYCHOL STUD, V65, P214, DOI 10.1007/s12646-019-00546-7
  63. Snyder HR, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00328
  64. Spooner DM, 2006, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V21, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.acn.2006.04.004
  65. Steil AV, 2022, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V27, P2964, DOI 10.1177/13591053221074592
  66. Strauss E., 2006, A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary
  67. Strong Jessica V, 2019, Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, V26, P367, DOI 10.1080/13825585.2018.1448356
  68. Stubberud J, 2020, FRONT NEUROL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fneur.2020.01011
  69. Stuss DT, 2011, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V17, P759, DOI 10.1017/S1355617711000695
  70. Terpstra AR, 2019, FRONT NEUROL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fneur.2019.00712
  71. Tirapu-Ustárroz J, 2018, REV NEUROLOGIA, V67, P215, DOI 10.33588/rn.6706.2017450
  72. Tirapu-Ustárroz J, 2017, REV NEUROLOGIA, V64, P75, DOI 10.33588/rn.6402.2016227
  73. Toplak ME, 2013, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V54, P131, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12001
  74. Tran CD, 2019, BILING-LANG COGN, V22, P714, DOI 10.1017/S1366728918000160
  75. Tricco AC, 2018, ANN INTERN MED, V169, P467, DOI 10.7326/M18-0850
  76. United Nations Children's Fund, 2017, EARL MOM MATT EV CHI
  77. Ursache A, 2016, BRAIN BEHAV, V6, DOI 10.1002/brb3.531
  78. Vai B, 2021, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V278, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.060
  79. van Kessel E, 2020, J NEURO-ONCOL, V146, P97, DOI 10.1007/s11060-019-03341-6
  80. Milioni ALV, 2017, J ATTEN DISORD, V21, P455, DOI 10.1177/1087054714554933
  81. Webster Felipe, 2019, Rev Ecuat Neurol, V28, P52
  82. Xie WH, 2022, LANGUAGES-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/languages7040247
  83. Yang YingKai Yang YingKai, 2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, V84, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.020
  84. Zelazo PD, 2020, ANNU REV CLIN PSYCHO, V16, P431, DOI 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072319-024242
  85. Zelazo PD, 2012, CHILD DEV PERSPECT, V6, P354, DOI 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00246.x

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IPq