Evidence for cardiac safety and antiarrhythmic potential of chloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
44
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Citação
EUROPACE, v.16, n.6, p.887-892, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
To perform a comprehensive evaluation of heart rhythm disorders and the influence of disease/therapy factors in a large systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort. Three hundred and seventeen consecutive patients of an ongoing electronic database protocol were evaluated by resting electrocardiogram and 142 were randomly selected for 24 h Holter monitoring for arrhythmia and conduction disturbances. The mean age was 40.2 +/- 12.1 years and disease duration was11.4 +/- 8.1 years. Chloroquine (CQ) therapy was identified in 69.7% with a mean use of 8.5 +/- 6.7 years. Electrocardiogram abnormalities were detected in 66 patients (20.8%): prolonged QTc/QTd (14.2%); bundle-branch block (2.5%); and atrioventricular block (AVB) (1.6%). Age was associated with AVB (P = 0.029) and prolonged QTc/QTd (P = 0.039) whereas anti-Ro/SS-A and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores were not (P > 0.05). Chloroquine was negatively associated with AVB (P = 0.01) as was its longer use (6.1 +/- 6.9 vs. 1.0 +/- 2.5 years, P = 0.018). Time of CQ use was related with the absence of AVB [odds ratio (OR) = 0.103; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.011-0.934, P = 0.043] in multiple logistic regression. Holter monitoring revealed abnormalities in 121 patients (85.2%): supraventricular ectopies (63.4%) and tachyarrhythmia (18.3%); ventricular ectopies (45.8%). Atrial tachycardia/fibrillation (AT/AF) were associated with shorter CQ duration (7.05 +/- 7.99 vs. 3.63 +/- 5.02 years, P = 0.043) with a trend to less CQ use (P = 0.054), and older age (P < 0.001). Predictors of AT/AF in multiple logistic regression were age (OR = 1.115; 95% CI = 1.059-1.174, P < 0.001) and anti-Ro/SS-A (OR = 0.172; 95% CI = 0.047-0.629, P = 0.008). Chloroquine seems to play a protective role in the unexpected high rate of cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disturbances observed in SLE. Further studies are necessary to determine if this antiarrhythmic effect is due to the disease control or a direct effect of the drug.
Palavras-chave
Antimalarial, Arrhythmia, Safety, Treatment, Systemic lupus erythematosus
Referências
  1. ABUSHAKRA M, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P1265
  2. Benjamin EJ, 1998, CIRCULATION, V98, P946
  3. BHARATI S, 1975, AM J CARDIOL, V35, P299, DOI 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90017-X
  4. BOMBARDIER C, 1992, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V35, P630, DOI 10.1002/art.1780350606
  5. Bourre-Tessier J, 2011, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V63, P1031, DOI 10.1002/acr.20470
  6. BURRELL ZL, 1958, NEW ENGL J MED, V258, P798, DOI 10.1056/NEJM195804172581608
  7. Cardoso CRL, 2005, LUPUS, V14, P846, DOI 10.1191/0961203305lu2225oa
  8. Chiang Chern-En, 2004, Cardiol Rev, V12, P222, DOI 10.1097/01.crd.0000123842.42287.cf
  9. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, 2005, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V52, P677
  10. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, 2007, CARDIOLOGY, V107, P73, DOI 10.1159/000094079
  11. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, 2005, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V52, P676, DOI 10.1002/art.20845
  12. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, 2007, RHEUMATOLOGY, V46, P808, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/ke1402
  13. Couderc JP, 2010, J ELECTROCARDIOL, V43, P396, DOI 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.07.009
  14. GODEAU P, 1981, ANN MED INTERNE, V132, P234
  15. HARRIS L, 1988, CAN J CARDIOL, V4, P295
  16. Hebbar P, 2011, HEART RHYTHM, V8, pS310
  17. Hochberg MC, 1997, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V40, P1725, DOI 10.1002/art.1780400928
  18. Izmirly PM, 2010, ANN RHEUM DIS, V69, P1827, DOI 10.1136/ard.2009.119263
  19. JAMES TN, 1965, ANN INTERN MED, V63, P402
  20. JURIK AG, 1985, RHEUMATOL INT, V5, P205, DOI 10.1007/BF00541337
  21. Kojuri J, 2012, BMC CARDIOVASC DISOR, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-12-11
  22. KURATA N, 1976, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V19, P574, DOI 10.1002/art.1780190309
  23. Lazzerini PE, 2007, AM J CARDIOL, V100, P1029, DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.04.048
  24. Lazzerini PE, 2004, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V50, P1248, DOI 10.1002/art.20130
  25. Liautaud S, 2005, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V24, P162, DOI 10.1007/s10067-004-0995-3
  26. Noujaim SF, 2011, CARDIOVASC RES, V89, P862, DOI 10.1093/cvr/cvr008
  27. Puymirat E, 2008, REV MED INTERNE, V29, P741, DOI 10.1016/j.revmed.2008.06.019
  28. Reffelmann T, 2006, CIRCULATION, V114, pE357, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.600627
  29. Rhodus N L, 1990, Spec Care Dentist, V10, P46, DOI 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1990.tb01195.x
  30. Seferovic PM, 2006, RHEUMATOLOGY, V45, P39, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/kel315
  31. Teixeira Ricardo Alkmim, 2002, Arq Bras Cardiol, V79, P85, DOI 10.1590/S0066-782X2002001000009
  32. Teixeira Ricardo Alkmim, 2010, Rev Bras Reumatol, V50, P81, DOI 10.1590/S0482-50042010000100008
  33. Wagner GS, 2009, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V53, P1003, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.016
  34. Wozniacka A, 2006, LUPUS, V15, P521, DOI 10.1191/0961203306lu2345oa
  35. Xie Shang-Kui, 1998, Journal of Dermatology (Tokyo), V25, P367
  36. Yavuz B, 2007, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V26, P376, DOI 10.1007/s10067-006-0364-5