Reversible Pulmonary Trunk Banding VIII: Intermittent Overload Causes Harmless Hypertrophy in Adult Goat

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Citação
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, v.95, n.4, p.1422-1428, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background. Traditional pulmonary artery banding (PAB) is not always suitable for mature subpulmonary ventricle retraining. We sought to assess in detail the myocardial morphologic adaptations of two different protocols for inducing right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy in an adult animal model. Methods. Eighteen adult goats were distributed into three groups: sham (no systolic overload), traditional (continuous systolic overload), and intermittent (daily 12-hour systolic overload). Systolic overload was adjusted to achieve a 0.7 RV-to-aortic pressure ratio. All animals underwent weekly echocardiographic studies, and hemodynamic evaluations were performed 3 times a week. After 4 weeks, the animals were humanely killed for morphologic assessment. Results. A 37.2% increase was observed in the RV wall thickness of the intermittent group (p < 0.05), but no significant echocardiographic changes were observed in the other two groups. The intermittent and traditional groups had a 55.7% and 36.7% increase in RV mass, respectively, compared with the sham group (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in myocardial water content of the three groups (p = 0.27). RV myocardial fiber and nuclei diameters were increased in the intermittent group compared with the sham group (p < 0.05). The area of collagen deposition in the RV interstitium was increased 98% in traditional group compared with the sham group (p < 0.05). No significant cellular proliferation occurred in any group. Conclusions. This study suggests that a more effective and harmless hypertrophy can be achieved in adult animals using intermittent PAB compared with the traditional approach. (Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:1422-8) (c) 2013 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Abduch MCD, 2007, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V133, P1510, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.010
  2. Anderson R, 2007, SEMIN THORAC CARDIOV, V10, P76, DOI 10.1053/j.pcsu.2007.01.016
  3. Assad RS, 2011, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V142, P1108, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007
  4. Assad Renato Samy, 2006, Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc, V21, P418, DOI 10.1590/S0102-76382006000400012
  5. Braun MU, 2003, CARDIOVASC RES, V59, P658, DOI 10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00470-X
  6. Devaney EJ, 2003, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V125, P500, DOI 10.1067/mtc.2003.158
  7. Dias CA, 2002, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V124, P999, DOI 10.1067/mtc.2002.124234
  8. Kollars CAK, 2010, AM J CARDIOL, V105, P735, DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.066
  9. Lang RM, 2005, J AM SOC ECHOCARDIOG, V18, P1440, DOI 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005
  10. Le Bret E, 2005, ANN THORAC SURG, V79, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.088
  11. Mavroudis C, 2000, ANN THORAC SURG, V69, P851, DOI 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01545-3
  12. MEE RBB, 1986, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V92, P385
  13. Miana LA, 2010, ARQ BRAS CARDIOL, V95, P364, DOI 10.1590/S0066-782X2010005000105
  14. Perrino C, 2006, J CLIN INVEST, V116, P1547, DOI 10.1172/JC125397
  15. Poirier NC, 2004, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V127, P975, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.10.024
  16. Puley G, 1999, AM J CARDIOL, V83, P1080, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00019-3
  17. SINGH S, 1980, YALE J BIOL MED, V53, P459
  18. Soonpaa MH, 1998, CIRC RES, V83, P15
  19. Valente AS, 2008, REV BRAS CIR CARDIOV, V23, P60, DOI 10.1590/S0102-76382008000100011
  20. vanSon JAM, 1996, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V111, P342, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70443-9
  21. Vida VL, 2007, CARDIOL YOUNG, V17, P202, DOI 10.1017/S1047951107000376
  22. Winlaw DS, 2005, CIRCULATION, V111, P405, DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000153355.92687.FA