Disclosing the diagnosis of schizophrenia: A pilot study of the 'Coming Out Proud' intervention
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Autores
HUNGERBUEHLER, Ines
ROESSLER, Wulf
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, v.65, n.3, p.244-251, 2019
Resumo
Background: Schizophrenia is one of the most stigmatized psychiatric disorders, and disclosing it is often a source of stress to individuals with the disorder. The Coming Out Proud (COP) group intervention is designed to reduce the stigma's negative impact and help participants decide if they want to disclose their disorder. Aims: To assess the effect of the COP intervention in individuals with the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Methods: A pilot study of 3 2-hour group lessons (6-12 participants) per week. Individuals were selected from three specialized outpatient services in Sao Paulo, Brazil; 46 people were willing to participate, 11 dropped out during the intervention and 4 were excluded due to low intelligence quotient (IQ), resulting in a final sample of 31 participants. Outcomes were assessed before (T0/baseline) and after (T1/directly) after the COP intervention, and at 3-week follow-up (T2/3 weeks after T1). We applied eight scales, of which four scales are analyzed in this article (Coming Out with Mental Illness Scale (COMIS), Cognitive Appraisal of Stigma as a Stressor (CogApp), Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale-Short Form (SSMIS) and Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination Questionnaire (PDDQ)). Results: People who completed the COP intervention showed a significant increase in the decision to disclose their diagnosis (22.5% in T0 vs 67.7% in T2). As to the perception of stigma as a stressor, mean values significantly increased after the intervention (T0 = 3.83, standard deviation (SD) = .92 vs T2 = 4.44, SD = 1.05; p = .006). Two results had marginal significance: self-stigma was reduced (T0 = 3.10, SD = 1.70 vs T2 = 2.73, SD = 1.87; p = .063), while perceived discrimination increased (T0 = 2.68, SD = .55 vs T2 = 2.93, SD = .75; p = .063). Conclusion: This study suggests that the COP group intervention facilitated participants' disclosure decisions, and the increasing awareness of stigma as a stressor in life may have facilitated their decision to eventually disclose their disorder. The results raise questions that require further analysis, taking sociocultural factors into account, as stigma is experienced differently across cultures.
Palavras-chave
Schizophrenia, prejudice, social stigma, mental health, stigma and schizophrenia
Referências
- Alexander LA, 2003, J MENTAL HLTH, V12, P271, DOI 10.1080/0963823031000118267
- American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU
- Angermeyer Matthias C, 2002, World Psychiatry, V1, P21
- Angermeyer MC, 2006, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V113, P163, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00699.x
- Angermeyer MC, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V109, P420, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00310.x
- Bhugra D, 2005, PLOS MED, V2, P372, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020151
- Clement S, 2012, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-244X-12-36
- Corrigan P. W., 2014, COMING OUT PROUD ELI
- Corrigan P. W., 2004, BEAT STIGMA DISCRIMI
- Corrigan PW, 2006, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V25, P875, DOI 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875
- Corrigan PW, 2015, PSYCHIAT RES, V229, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.053
- Corrigan PW, 2012, PSYCHIAT RES, V199, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.009
- Corrigan PW, 2010, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V38, P259, DOI 10.1002/jcop.20363
- Corrigan PW, 2002, CLIN PSYCHOL-SCI PR, V9, P35, DOI 10.1093/clipsy/9.1.35
- Crisp Arthur, 2005, World Psychiatry, V4, P106
- Dinos S, 2004, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V184, P176, DOI 10.1192/bjp.184.2.176
- Hengartner MP, 2012, REV PSIQ CLIN-BRAZIL, V39, P115
- KARNO M, 1987, J NERV MENT DIS, V175, P143, DOI 10.1097/00005053-198703000-00004
- Knight MTD, 2006, BEHAV COGN PSYCHOTH, V34, P305, DOI 10.1017/S1352465805002705
- LEHMAN AF, 1988, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN, V11, P51, DOI 10.1016/0149-7189(88)90033-X
- LINK BG, 1989, AM SOCIOL REV, V54, P400, DOI 10.2307/2095613
- LINK BG, 1991, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V32, P302, DOI 10.2307/2136810
- Loch A. A., 2013, THESIS
- Lopez SR, 2004, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V113, P428, DOI 10.1037/0021-843x.113.3.428
- Lucksted A, 2011, PSYCHIATR REHABIL J, V35, P51, DOI 10.2975/35.1.2011.51.54
- Lundberg B, 2008, INT J SOC PSYCHIATR, V54, P47, DOI 10.1177/0020764007082345
- Oliveira SEH, 2015, PSYCHIAT RES, V229, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.047
- Pachankis JE, 2007, PSYCHOL BULL, V133, P328, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.328
- Rosenberg M., 1965, SOC ADOLESCENT SELF
- Rusch N, 2018, J NERV MENT DIS, V206, P383, DOI 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000810
- Rusch N, 2014, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V204, P391, DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.135772
- Rusch N, 2009, SCHIZOPHR RES, V110, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2009.01.005
- SARTORIUS N, 1977, PSYCHOL MED, V7, P529, DOI 10.1017/S0033291700004517
- Sibitz I, 2007, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V42, P909, DOI 10.1007/s00127-007-0245-5
- SLAVINSKY AT, 1982, NURS RES, V31, P284
- Stuart H, 2001, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V46, P245, DOI 10.1177/070674370104600304
- Versola-Russo JM, 2006, INT J PSYCHOSOCIAL R, V10, P89
- WHO, 2013, MENT HLTH ACT PLAN 2
- Wood AM, 2008, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V55, P385, DOI 10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385
- Wood L, 2016, SCHIZOPHR RES, V176, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2016.05.001
- Wood L, 2014, PSYCHIAT RES, V220, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.07.012
- Yalom I, 1995, THEORY PRACTICE GROU
- Yanos PT, 2011, INT J GROUP PSYCHOTH, V61, P577, DOI 10.1521/ijgp.2011.61.4.576