Uncovering Underlying Processes Before Illusion of Control Begins in Gambling Disorder: A Pilot Study

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_BERG_Uncovering_Underlying_Processes_Before_Illusion_of_Control_Begins_2020.PDF (675.84 KB)
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Autores
KIM, Hyoun S.
HODGINS, David C.
Citação
JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, v.36, n.3, p.829-849, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Gambling Disorder (GD) is characterized by persistent betting even in face of accruing debts and psychosocial hardship. Gambling Disorder behavior has been linked to conditioning, cognitive distortions and superstitious behavior. Previous studies have demonstrated that during response-outcome analytical tests (ROAT), non-gambling individuals are precluded from response extinction when failure feedback is suppressed, and develop superstitious behaviors and illusion of control instead. Gambling can be regarded as a ROAT paradigm in which disordered gamblers (DGs) fail to compute failure feedback; hence they do not perceive the independence between response and outcome. In order to investigate early phenomena on response and outcome processing in DGs, we developed two short ROAT versions, one with a controllable outcome and one with an uncontrollable outcome, both with explicit failure feedback. Twenty DGs and twenty healthy controls were assessed using this novel paradigm. Compared to controls, DGs reported higher distress during the controllable ROAT, less self-confidence in the uncontrollable ROAT, and more random responses and less use of analytical strategies in both tests, evidencing potential deficits in cognitive control. In contrast to previous findings, DGs did not demonstrate more superstitious beliefs, or illusion of control, and were generally more skeptical than controls regarding the controllability of both ROAT versions. Taken together, our findings provide some support for deficits in cognitive control in GD that precede illusion of control and superstitious behaviors.
Palavras-chave
Gambling disorder, Response-outcome, Cognitive distortion, Illusion of control, Learned helplessness
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/37875
Referências
  1. Aeschleman SR, 2003, BEHAV PROCESS, V61, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00158-4
  2. Allan LG, 2005, LEARN BEHAV, V33, P250
  3. ALLOY LB, 1979, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V108, P441, DOI 10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441
  4. American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
  5. American Psychiatric Association, 1994, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
  6. Amorim Patricia, 2000, Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, V22, P106
  7. [Anonymous], 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V277, P925
  8. Arnsten AFT, 2005, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V57, P1377, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.08.019
  9. ATLAS GD, 1990, BEHAV RES THER, V28, P523, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90139-A
  10. Barrault S, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P183, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0150
  11. Bechara A, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P1293, DOI 10.1126/science.275.5304.1293
  12. Benhsain K, 2004, ADDICT BEHAV, V29, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.011
  13. Blanco F, 2011, Q J EXP PSYCHOL, V64, P1290, DOI 10.1080/17470218.2011.552727
  14. Blume SB, 2004, SUBSTANCE ABUSE COMP, P488
  15. BOND A, 1974, BRIT J MED PSYCHOL, V47, P211, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1974.tb02285.x
  16. Boynton DM, 2003, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V91, P119, DOI 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00064-5
  17. Brevers D, 2015, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V278, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.09.026
  18. BROWN RIF, 1987, BEHAV PSYCHOTHER, V15, P111, DOI 10.1017/S0141347300011204
  19. BURGER J M, 1982, Motivation and Emotion, V6, P329, DOI 10.1007/BF00998189
  20. BURGER JM, 1986, J RES PERS, V20, P66, DOI 10.1016/0092-6566(86)90110-8
  21. Cantinotti M, 2004, PSYCHOL ADDICT BEHAV, V18, P143, DOI 10.1037/0893-164X.18.2.143
  22. Coventry KR, 1998, BRIT J PSYCHOL, V89, P629, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02707.x
  23. Delfabbro P, 2004, J GAMBL STUD, V20, P1, DOI 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016701.17146.d0
  24. Delfabbro PH, 2000, J PSYCHOL, V134, P117, DOI 10.1080/00223980009600854
  25. Diskin Katherine M., 1999, J Gambl Stud, V15, P17, DOI 10.1023/A:1023062912062
  26. FORD CE, 1985, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V49, P1330, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1330
  27. FRIEDLAND N, 1992, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V63, P923, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.923
  28. Goodie AS, 2003, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V29, P598, DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.598
  29. HARDING TW, 1980, PSYCHOL MED, V10, P231, DOI 10.1017/S0033291700043993
  30. Hardoon KK, 2001, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V57, P749, DOI 10.1002/jclp.1047
  31. HIROTO DS, 1975, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V31, P311, DOI 10.1037/h0076270
  32. *IBGE, 1998, PESQ NAC AM DOM PNAD
  33. Johnson EE, 1998, PSYCHOL REP, V83, P1219, DOI 10.2466/PR0.83.7.1219-1224
  34. JOSEPHS RA, 1992, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V62, P26, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.26
  35. Joukhador J, 2004, J GAMBL STUD, V20, P171, DOI 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000022308.27774.2b
  36. LADOUCEUR R, 1984, J PSYCHOL, V117, P47, DOI 10.1080/00223980.1984.9923657
  37. LADOUCEUR R, 1984, J PSYCHOL, V117, P37, DOI 10.1080/00223980.1984.9923656
  38. LANGER EJ, 1975, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V32, P311, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
  39. LESIEUR H, 1984, CHASE
  40. LESIEUR HR, 1987, AM J PSYCHIAT, V144, P1184
  41. Lorains FK, 2014, ADDICTION, V109, P1128, DOI 10.1111/add.12494
  42. Marazziti Donatella, 2008, Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health, V4, P7, DOI 10.1186/1745-0179-4-7
  43. MARI JD, 1986, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V148, P23, DOI 10.1192/bjp.148.1.23
  44. MATUTE H, 1995, Q J EXP PSYCHOL-B, V48, P142
  45. MATUTE H, 1994, LEARN MOTIV, V25, P216, DOI 10.1006/lmot.1994.1012
  46. Matute H, 1996, PSYCHOL SCI, V7, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00376.x
  47. Medeiros G, 2016, J GAMBL STUD, V32, P231, DOI 10.1007/s10899-015-9527-0
  48. Msetfi RM, 2005, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V134, P10, DOI 10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.10
  49. Myrseth H, 2010, J GAMBL STUD, V26, P561, DOI 10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6
  50. Orgaz C, 2013, FRONT PSYCHOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00306
  51. Perales JC, 2017, J GAMBL STUD, V33, P705, DOI 10.1007/s10899-016-9634-6
  52. Petry N M, 2001, Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry, V6, P177, DOI 10.1053/scnp.2001.22920
  53. Rodriguez-Jimenez R, 2006, J GAMBL STUD, V22, P451, DOI 10.1007/s10899-006-9028-2
  54. Romo L, 2016, J BEHAV ADDICT, V5, P649, DOI 10.1556/2006.5.2016.070
  55. Rosenthal R. J., 1989, COMPULSIVE GAMBLING, P101
  56. RUGLE L, 1993, J NERV MENT DIS, V181, P107, DOI 10.1097/00005053-199302000-00006
  57. Seligman M., 1975, HELPLESSNESS DEPRESS
  58. Tavares H, 2003, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V64, P433, DOI 10.4088/JCP.v64n0413
  59. Tavares H, 2003, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V48, P22
  60. Tavares H, 1999, REV PSIQUIATRIA CLIN, V26, P179
  61. Tavares H, 2014, ADDICTION, V109, P1972, DOI 10.1111/add.12560
  62. Tavares H, 2010, PSYCHIAT RES, V180, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.014
  63. TAYLOR SE, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P193, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
  64. WASSERMAN EA, 1983, LEARN MOTIV, V14, P406, DOI 10.1016/0023-9690(83)90025-5
  65. Wiehler A, 2015, NEUROSCI RES, V90, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.neures.2014.09.008
  66. WING JK, 1990, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V47, P589
  67. Wohl MJA, 2002, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V28, P1388, DOI 10.1177/014616702236870
  68. Wolfson Sandy, 2002, J Gambl Stud, V18, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1014548111740
  69. World Health Organization, 1993, ICD 10 CLASS MENT BE

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MPS
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/23