Influence of fetal acidemia on fetal heart rate analyzed by computerized cardiotocography in pregnancies with placental insufficiency
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
INFORMA HEALTHCARE
Citação
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, v.26, n.18, p.1820-1824, 2013
Resumo
Objective: To determine the influence of fetal acidemia on fetal heart rate (FHR) parameters analyzed by computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) in pregnancies with placental insufficiency. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 46 pregnancies with placental insufficiency between 26 and 34 weeks gestation by abnormal umbilical artery Doppler [pulsatility index (PI)>95th percentile]. Results: Twenty fetuses had acidemia at birth, pH<7.20 (43.5%) and 26 had normal pH (56.5%). In the analysis of FHR parameters, fetal movements (FM) per hour was significantly lower in the group with acidemia (median = 2) when compared with the group with normal pH (median = 15, p = 0.019). The values of pH correlated positively with FM (rho = 0.35; p = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.061 to 0.577) and basal FHR (rho = 0.37, p = 0,011, 95% CI: 0.090 to 0.597) and negatively with the ductus venosus (DV) PI for veins (PIV) z-score (rho = -0.31, p = 0,036, 95% CI: -0.550 to -0.021). Logistic regression showed that the DV PIV z-score (p = 0.0232) and basal FHR (p = 0.0401) were independent variables associated with acidemia at birth. Conclusions: The present results suggest that cCTG parameters may be useful in the management of cases with early onset placental insufficiency in association with Doppler velocimetry assessment, and that basal FHR and DV-PIV are most clearly in association with acidemia at birth.
Palavras-chave
Computerized cardiotocography, doppler velocimetry, ductus venosus, fetal acidemia, placental insufficiency
Referências
- Anceschi MM, 2004, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V86, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.05.012
- Anceschi MM, 2003, J PERINAT MED, V31, P231, DOI 10.1515/JPM.2003.031
- Anceschi MM, 1999, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V65, P267, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00055-7
- Baschat AA, 2003, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V22, P561, DOI 10.1002/uog.902
- Baschat AA, 2007, OBSTET GYNECOL, V109, P253, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75
- Baschat AA, 2003, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V21, P124, DOI 10.1002/uog.20
- Bilardo CM, 2004, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V23, P119, DOI 10.1002/uog.965
- Bracero LA, 1999, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V181, P1254, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70118-3
- Dawes GS, 1996, J PERINAT MED, V24, P25, DOI 10.1515/jpme.1996.24.1.25
- Esposti F, 2006, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, V1, P6157
- Francisco RPV, 2006, OBSTET GYNECOL, V107, P1042, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000209192.00890.3a
- Garcia GS, 2008, ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET, V278, P125, DOI 10.1007/s00404-007-0537-8
- Guzman ER, 1996, OBSTET GYNECOL, V87, P969, DOI 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00020-8
- Hecher K, 2001, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V18, P564, DOI 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x
- Huhn EA, 2011, PRENATAL DIAG, V31, P509, DOI 10.1002/pd.2728
- Nijhuis IJM, 2000, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V89, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00162-1
- Nomura RMY, 2009, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V147, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.06.029
- Ortigosa C, 2012, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V25, P2620, DOI 10.3109/14767058.2012.711394
- Pardey J, 2002, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V186, P1095, DOI 10.1067/mob.2002.122447
- Romano M, 2006, COMPUT BIOL MED, V36, P619, DOI 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.04.004
- Serra V, 2008, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V115, P1101, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01774.x
- Soncini E, 2006, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V128, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.001
- Turam OM, 2008, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V32, P160, DOI 10.1002/uog.5386
- Turan S, 2007, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V30, P750, DOI 10.1002/uog.4101
- Vinkesteijn ASM, 2004, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V23, P461, DOI 10.1002/uog.1032