The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physicians' Working Hours and Earnings in Sao Paulo and Maranhao States, Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
MDPI
Autores
OLIVEIRA, Bruno Luciano Carneiro Alves de
REIS, Regimarina Soares
CARVALHO, Ruth Helena de Souza Britto Ferreira de
ALVES, Maria Teresa Seabra Soares e
RUSSO, Giuliano
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, v.19, n.16, article ID 10085, 13p, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Evidence exists on the health impacts of the current COVID-19 pandemic on health workers, but less is known about its impact on their work dynamics and livelihoods. This matters, as health workers-and physicians in particular-are a scarce and expensive resource in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our cross-sectional survey set out to explore changes in working hours and earnings during the second year of the pandemic in a representative sample of 1183 physicians in Brazil's Sao Paulo (SP) and Maranhao (MA) states. Descriptive analysis and inferential statistics were employed to explore differences in working hours and earnings among public and private sector physicians across the two locations. The workloads and earnings of doctors working exclusively in the public sector increased the most in the second year of the epidemic, particularly in MA. Conversely, the largest proportion of private-only doctors in our sample saw a decrease in their working hours (48.4%, 95% CI 41.8-55.0), whereas the largest proportion of public-only doctors in MA saw an increase in their working hours (44.4%, 95% CI 38.0-50.8). Although earnings remained broadly stable in the public sector, a third of public sector-only physicians in MA saw an increase in their earnings (95% CI 24.4-36.2). More than half of private-only doctors across both states saw a decrease in their earnings (52.2%, 95% CI 45.6-58.8). The largest proportion of dual practitioners (the majority in Brazil and in our sample) maintained their pre-pandemic levels of income (38.8%, 95% CI 35.3-42.3). As public-sector doctors have been key in the fight against the pandemic, it is critical to invest in these cadres in order to develop epidemic preparedness in LMICs, and to find new ways to harness for-profit actors to deliver social benefits.
Palavras-chave
COVID-19, physician health, health workers in Brazil, health system, health labor market, health workforce in LMICs
Referências
  1. Althubaiti A, 2016, J MULTIDISCIP HEALTH, V9, P211, DOI 10.2147/JMDH.S104807
  2. Andrietta LS, 2020, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002122
  3. [Anonymous], JHP COVID 19 MAP
  4. Babu GR, 2021, INT J INFECT DIS, V104, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.048
  5. Blumenthal D, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V383, P1483, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsb2021088
  6. Buerhaus PI, 2011, NURS ECON, V29, P163
  7. Campbell, 2013, UNIVERSAL TRUTH NO H
  8. Caram B., 2022, REUTERS
  9. Costa D.C.A.R., 2021, SA DE DEBATE, V44, P232, DOI [10.1590/0103-11042020e415, DOI 10.1590/0103-11042020E415]
  10. De Jaegher K, 2000, J HEALTH ECON, V19, P231, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00029-6
  11. Villela EFD, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18126511
  12. Gragnolati M, 2013, DIR DEV, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-9843-2
  13. Horton R, 2016, LANCET, V388, P540, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30774-7
  14. Jesus TS, 2019, BMJ OPEN, V9, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032972
  15. Khanal P, 2020, GLOBALIZATION HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12992-020-00621-z
  16. Li JH, 2021, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, DOI [10.1186/s12889-020-10146-0, 10.1186/s12889-021-10354-2]
  17. Massuda A, 2018, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V3, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000829
  18. McPake B, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V122, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.040
  19. Meghani A., 2022, PLoS Global Public Health, V2, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000750
  20. Miotto BA, 2018, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12913-018-3076-z
  21. Monaghesh E, 2020, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4
  22. Montagu D, 2016, LANCET, V388, P613, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30242-2
  23. OECD, 2021, OECD REV HLTH SYSTEM, DOI [10.1787/146d0dea-en, DOI 10.1787/146D0DEA-EN, 10.1787/9789264120914-en]
  24. Paim J, 2011, LANCET, V377, P1778, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60054-8
  25. Pappa S, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18094457
  26. Russo G., 2022, MEDRXIV, DOI [10.1101/2022.05.27.22275696, DOI 10.1101/2022.05.27.22275696]
  27. Russo G, 2021, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V36, P542, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czaa180
  28. Russo G, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0241017
  29. Russo G, 2017, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2151-1
  30. Russo G, 2014, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V29, P774, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czt071
  31. Scheffer M, 2022, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V68, P691, DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.20220172
  32. Scheffer MC, 2021, DEMOGRAFIA MEDICA NO, P125
  33. Scheffler R. M., 2016, TOOLS DATA NEEDS HLT, P11
  34. Scott A, 2020, HUM RESOUR HEALTH, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12960-020-00498-4
  35. Suhrcke M, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020724
  36. Tan CS, 2021, J PHARM POLICY PRACT, V14, DOI 10.1186/s40545-021-00322-x
  37. The Global Fund, 2021, IMP COVID 19 HLTH CA
  38. Thomson S., 2014, EC CRISIS HLTH SYSTE
  39. UKRI, STRENGTH HLTH WORKF
  40. Wallace LJ, 2022, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.878225
  41. Wang XF, 2020, CHEST, V158, pS65, DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
  42. Xu D, 2022, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V37, P440, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czac017
  43. Zhong J, 2022, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2022.129