The liver injury following ischemia and reperfusion is worse in experimental knockout heterozygote mouse model for expression of connexin 43

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
Autores
COGLIATI, Bruno
HOMEM, Adriana Ribeiro
ALOIAV, Thiago Pinheiro Arrais
AQUINO NETO, Nelson de
MOREIRA, Jairo Marques
RENO, Leonardo da Cruz
Citação
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, v.34, n.10, article ID e201901003, 9p, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: To evaluate that Connexin (Cx43) plays a role in lesions after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury. Methods: We use Cx43 deficient model (heterozygotes mice) and compared to a wild group. The groups underwent 1 hour ischemia and 24 hours reperfusion. The heterozygote genotype was confirmed by PCR. We analyzed the hepatic enzymes (AST, ALT, GGT) and histology. Results: The mice with Cx43 deficiency showed an ALT mean value of 4166 vs. 307 in the control group (p<0.001); AST mean value of 7231 vs. 471 in the control group (p<0.001); GGT mean value of 9.4 vs. 1.7 in the control group (p=0.001); histology showed necrosis and inflammation in the knockout group. Conclusions: This research demonstrated that the deficiency of Cx43 worses the prognosis for liver injury. The topic is a promising target for therapeutics advancements in liver diseases and procedures.
Palavras-chave
GAP junctions, Connexin 43, Ischemia, Reperfusion, Liver, Cell communication, Mice
Referências
  1. Abe Y, 2009, FREE RADICAL BIO MED, V46, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.029
  2. Andraus W, 2007, CLINICS, V62, P483, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322007000400016
  3. Belghiti J, 1996, ANN SURG, V224, P155, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199608000-00007
  4. BEYER EC, 1987, J CELL BIOL, V105, P2621, DOI 10.1083/jcb.105.6.2621
  5. Boengler K, 2005, CARDIOVASC RES, V67, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.04.014
  6. Borghi-Scoazec G, 1997, Liver Transpl Surg, V3, P407, DOI 10.1053/jlts.1997.v3.pm0009346771
  7. Byrd JC, 2005, BLOOD, V105, P959, DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-05-1693
  8. Castro e Silva Jr O, 2002, ACTA CIR BRAS, V17, P96, DOI 10.1590/S0102-86502002000900020
  9. Clavien PA, 2000, ANN SURG, V232, P155, DOI 10.1097/00000658-200008000-00001
  10. Collard CD, 2001, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V94, P1133, DOI 10.1097/00000542-200106000-00030
  11. Eiberger J, 2001, CELL COMMUN ADHES, V8, P163, DOI 10.3109/15419060109080717
  12. Hanner F, 2010, AM J PHYSIOL-REG I, V298, pR1143, DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.00808.2009
  13. JHAPPAN C, 1990, CELL, V61, P1137, DOI 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90076-Q
  14. Liu H, 2005, CELL CYCLE, V4, P646, DOI 10.4161/cc.4.5.1674
  15. Maes M, 2014, FRONT PHYSIOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00405
  16. Nielsen MS, 2012, COMPR PHYSIOL, V2, P1981, DOI 10.1002/cphy.c110051
  17. Pacheco EG, 2001, ACTA CIR BRAS, V16, P41
  18. Pereira RM, 2009, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V15, P2579, DOI 10.3748/wjg.15.2579
  19. REAUME AG, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P1831, DOI 10.1126/science.7892609
  20. Remirez D, 2002, INFLAMM RES, V51, P351, DOI 10.1007/PL00000314
  21. Rhoden EL, 2000, REV COL BRAS CIR, V27, P373
  22. Rodriguez-Sinovas A, 2004, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V559, P245, DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.065144
  23. STONE A, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P1773, DOI 10.1126/science.7892599
  24. Vinken M, 2013, CURR MED CHEM, V20, P3011, DOI 10.2174/0929867311320240006
  25. Vinken M, 2018, INT J MOL, V19, P817
  26. VOLLMAR B, 1994, AM J PATHOL, V145, P1421
  27. WEKERLE H, 1994, ANN NEUROL, V36, pS47, DOI 10.1002/ana.410360714
  28. Xiao ZY, 2015, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V21, P468, DOI 10.1002/lt.24059
  29. Xu J, 2009, MOL MED REP, V2, P713, DOI 10.3892/mmr_00000161