Absence of neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant in convalescent sera from individuals infected with the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus or its Gamma variant

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER ESPANA
Citação
CLINICS, v.77, article ID 100068, 4p, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if neutralizing antibody responses induced by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 strain that was dominant at the beginning of the pandemic or by the Gamma variant was effective against the Omicron variant. Methods: Convalescent sera from 109 individuals, never exposed to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, who had mild or moderate symptoms not requiring hospitalization following either a documented SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain infection or a Gamma variant infection, were assayed for in vitro neutralizing antibody activity against their original strains and the Omicron variant. Results: Following an infection with the ancestral strain, 56 (93.3%), 45 (77.6%) and 1 (1.7%) serum sample were positive for neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral, Gamma variant, and Omicron variant, respectively. After infection with the Gamma variant, 43 (87.8%) and 2 (4.1%) sera were positive for neutralizing antibodies against the Gamma and Omicron variants, respectively. Conclusions: Neutralizing antibodies generated following mild or moderate infection with the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain or the Gamma variant are not protective against the Omicron variant.
Palavras-chave
SARS-CoV-2, Omicron variant, Gamma variant, Neutralizing antibodies, Protective antibodies
Referências
  1. Aine OToole J.T., PANGOLIN COVID 19 LI
  2. Boehm E, 2021, CLIN MICROBIOL INFEC, V27, P1109, DOI 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.022
  3. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude. Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, DASHB GEN NETW
  4. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude. Secretaria de Vigilancia em Saude, B EP ESP DOENC PEIO
  5. Cao Y, 2021, NUMER LINEAR ALGEBR, V28, DOI [10.1002/nla.2362, 10.1038/s41586-021-04385-3]
  6. Cromer D, 2021, NAT REV IMMUNOL, V21, P395, DOI 10.1038/s41577-021-00550-x
  7. de Jesus JG, 2020, REV INST MED TROP SP, V62, DOI [10.1590/S1678-9946202062030, 10.1590/s1678-9946202062030]
  8. Dejnirattisai W, 2021, CELL, V184, P2939, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.055
  9. Faria NR, 2021, SCIENCE, V372, P815, DOI [10.1126/science.abh2644, 10.1101/2021.02.26.21252554, 10.1126/science.abh2644Article]
  10. Garcia-Beltran WF, 2021, CELL, V184, P2372, DOI [10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.006, 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.013]
  11. Hierholzer J. C., 1996, P25, DOI 10.1016/B978-012465330-6/50003-8
  12. Hoffmann M, 2021, CELL, V184, P2384, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.036
  13. Ju B, 2020, NATURE, V584, P115, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2380-z
  14. Kellam P, 2020, J GEN VIROL, V101, P791, DOI 10.1099/jgv.0.001439
  15. Khoshkam Z, 2021, J ADV RES, V31, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jare.2020.12.013
  16. Lau EHY, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-20247-4
  17. Leal FE, 2021, BMJ OPEN, V11, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042745
  18. Li MC, 2022, SIGNAL TRANSDUCT TAR, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41392-022-00880-9
  19. Mendrone A, 2021, TRANSFUSION, V61, P1181, DOI 10.1111/trf.16268
  20. Neter J, 1996, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD
  21. Nurtop E, 2018, VIROL J, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12985-018-1105-5
  22. Planas D, 2022, NATURE, V602, P671, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-04389-z
  23. Rodda LB, 2021, CELL, V184, P169, DOI [10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.029, 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843, 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1]
  24. Roltgen K, 2020, SCI IMMUNOL, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciimmunol.abe0240
  25. Schmidt F, 2022, NEW ENGL J MED, V386, P599, DOI 10.1056/NEJMc2119641
  26. Wendel S, 2020, TRANSFUSION, V60, P2938, DOI 10.1111/trf.16065