Anesthesiology Journal club assessment by means of semantic changes

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Citação
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, v.64, n.4, p.258-262, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background and objectives: the interactive approach of a journal club has been described in the medical education literature. The aim of this investigation is to present an assessment of journal club as a tool to address the question whether residents read more and critically. Methods: this study reports the performance of medical residents in anesthesiology from the Clinics Hospital - University of Sao Paulo Medical School. All medical residents were invited to answer five questions derived from discussed papers. The answer sheet consisted of an affirmative statement with a Likert type scale (totally disagree-disagree-not sure-agree-totally agree), each related to one of the chosen articles. The results were evaluated by means of item analysis - difficulty index and discrimination power. Results: residents filled one hundred and seventy three evaluations in the months of December 2011 (n = 51), July 2012 (n = 66) and December 2012 (n = 56). The first exam presented all items with straight statement, second and third exams presented mixed items. Separating ""totally agree"" from ""agree"" increased the difficulty indices, but did not improve the discrimination power. Conclusions: the use of a journal club assessment with straight and inverted statements and by means of five points scale for agreement has been shown to increase its item difficulty and discrimination power. This may reflect involvement either with the reading or the discussion during the journal meeting.
Palavras-chave
Education, Medical, Graduate, Anesthesiology, Self-assessment, Program evaluation, Educational measurement, Periodicals as topic
Referências
  1. Alguire PC, 1998, J GEN INTERN MED, V13, P347, DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00102.x
  2. Ausubel D. P., 2000, ACQUISITION RETENTIO
  3. Barnette JJ, 2000, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V60, P3361
  4. Burstein JL, 1996, AM J EMERG MED, V14, P561, DOI 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90099-6
  5. Crank-Patton A, 2001, CURR SURG, V58, P101, DOI 10.1016/S0149-7944(00)00410-4
  6. Dirschl DR, 2003, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P146, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000081203.51121.25
  7. Gronlund NE, 1968, CONSTRUCTING ACHIEVE
  8. Harris J, 2011, MED TEACH, V33, P9, DOI 10.3109/0142159X.2011.530321
  9. Hartzell JD, 2009, MED TEACH, V31, pE156, DOI 10.1080/01421590802516723
  10. Hinkson CR, 2011, RESP CARE, V56, P303, DOI 10.4187/respcare.00952
  11. Kelly AM, 2010, ACAD RADIOL, V17, P1073, DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.021
  12. Lee AG, 2005, SURV OPHTHALMOL, V50, P542, DOI 10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.08.002
  13. Letterie GS, 2000, J REPROD MED, V45, P299
  14. LINZER M, 1988, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V260, P2537, DOI 10.1001/jama.260.17.2537
  15. LINZER M, 1987, POSTGRAD MED J, V63, P475
  16. McLeod RS, 2010, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V211, P769, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.08.016
  17. Misra Usha Kant, 2007, J Assoc Physicians India, V55, P343
  18. Shifflette V, 2012, J SURG EDUC, V69, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.08.006
  19. SIDOROV J, 1995, ARCH INTERN MED, V155, P1193, DOI 10.1001/archinte.155.11.1193
  20. Valentini RP, 1997, POSTGRAD MED J, V73, P81